Refutation of National Post Article On Humanae Vitae - Prologue
Edmond July 21st, 2008In the Saturday, July 12, 2008 edition of the National Post, Charles Lewis published a full-page article entitled “A Hard Pill To Swallow”. He sees Humanae Vitae as “a giant flop”, a ban on contraception that is “universally ignored by the Catholic faithful”. The encyclical, according to Lewis, is “devastating to the Church’s credibility” because “it makes for dishonesty at the heart of the system” in the sense that ordinary Catholics do not believe contraception is a mortal sin, and they don’t even believe their leaders honestly think it is a mortal sin. It accuses HV of “inadvertently equating contraception and abortion,” and putting “emphasis on sexuality out of proportion to the whole of the Catholic moral life”.
Near the end, Lewis does not forget to mention Father Charles Curran, a renowned Church dissident, whose statements against HV “earned him the ire of the Church, and eventually his job at Catholic University in Washington.” Father Curran believes the Pope can’t change this constant teaching of the Church because he can’t admit that “the Holy Spirit allowed the bishops and the pope to make a mistake.” Here’s the link to the article:
http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=649220
I couldn’t help but chuckle as I read the article because the comments Lewis made are essentially how I had seen the issue of contraception some years ago when my heart was still in dire need of the circumcision of the Holy Spirit. It is either that in a matter of 10 to 15 years I have been completely brainwashed by Church teachings generally considered out-dated, repressive, and unrealistic by the world; or that the overpowering touch of the Spirit is such that my pride-swollen heart is now completely transformed, and its surgically dead muscles revived with good reason and spiritual sensitivity. Reading the article makes me realize I have come a long way since my “cafeteria Catholic” days.
For the benefit of the cafeteria Catholics in our midst and the many Father Currans still lurking around in the Church, ready to do spiritual violence to the unsuspecting Church faithful with their seemingly convincing theological half-truths, I will endeavor to pick apart Lewis’ criticism of HV and bring to light its fallacy through a special series of 3 to 4 emails (including this one) that will be released separately over the next few days. With all due respect and humility, I know there are many people who are better qualified to do this work, especially the clergy and a number of very insightful and scholarly members on the ECCCLC and the Family Spiritual Window. I humbly ask for their assistance and corrections where my refutation is weak. I will incorporate their input into the final version of my refutation, which will then be sent to Charles Lewis.
How many battles do we have to fight to counter the culture of death? For this one, let’s seek the intercession and guidance of Our Lady of Guadalupe, who always stands behind family and the sanctity of life.
Edmond Lo
2 Responses to “Refutation of National Post Article On Humanae Vitae - Prologue”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
July 21st, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Hi, Edmond:
Good work. I believe that as competant as they are, (many of our bishops and priests), our testimony weighs more for the fact we are the faithful that they called as not believing what the bishops teaching. In the attachment is part of my work for a Chinese group who are following the same tune as the news paper article, only in a milder tone. I searched for some data. it is in the attached file. This is not the whole article I wrote, for it is to be published by them. Perhaps you can find better data to support our faith.
Best regards in Christ,
Theresa
….
當時各方反應很激烈,反對的聲音也很大。教宗預先已知道這情形。因為真正的爭鬥不是權威與平信徒間的,而是:「有限的人」,要以自己有限的科技成就,向「造物主」爭權,可以與「造物主」平起平坐。但這是違反「人本性」的事。是教會絕不能苟同的。因為其後果是不堪設想的。
的確,從那時開始,世界就開始變了。各地日漸增高的離婚率與人工避孕的普及幾乎成正比。願意度婚姻生活並生養孩子的人也在減少。
以每十萬人口為基數,1995年的離婚人數是1965年的四倍多。以後的增加大約是每年1%左右。
在台灣,1996年的離婚率是30%, 2002的統計,結婚率:7.69/1,000人。離婚率:2.73/1,000 ,約是35.5%。而2007 登記結婚的有110,455對,而登記離婚:47,891對,約是 43.3%。
當然,離婚後,受害最深的莫過他們的兒女。 跟隨人工控制生育而來的「性解放」,更使道德觀與西墜之日俱落。在加拿大,用官方保守的統計,已見墮胎率高達30/100。即每10 個胎兒中,有3個是永不能見天日的。美國各州的墮胎率不同。美國的統計由1973年開始收集數字。多數的州在1973年的墮胎數字最低,1980-5年最高。(大約是六至七倍於1973年的數字) 。2003年稍微下降至1973年的三倍左右。1996年在美國每天有3700個胎兒被墮胎死亡。即每分鐘至少有六次以上的墮胎事件。而發展中國家的墮胎率是「工業」國家的四倍多。如此的兇殘行為却被譽為「女人自由選擇的權利」﹗
這一連串的反家庭洶潮,使日漸多的孩子被迫在破碎的家庭中生長,接着1990年代出現了同性戀者爭權的狂風,與安樂死的洶湧暗潮。傳媒用了大幅廣告與報導去渲染同性戀活動,歌頌安樂死的美好,而只字不提維護生命在國會山莊大聚會的事。看來,「人」因自我意識高漲而引起的驕傲,開始有尋求絕對自主的願望,之後又努力的去追求,以為可以得到更快樂的人生。結果「人」反而變得更漠視生命的價值。固然有很多人可以「為”我”而犧牲他人的身家性命」,也有人因為見不到生命的意義而自殺﹗中學生共同自殺或校園槍殺案的新聞,令人愁腸萬結,百思不解。事實上他們是病態社會的症狀。
….
July 21st, 2008 at 5:40 pm
Thanks, Dr. Hum.
I agree that the refutation may be more effective if it comes from the faithful as opposed to the clergy. All the best with the work you do in trying to convince your group. We have lots of work to do. Let’s roll up our sleeves and get our hands dirty! After the Theology of the Body, it’s time we embraced JPII’s ardent call for “a springtime for new evangelization” !
God bless!
Edmond